首页 新闻 体育 娱乐 游戏 邮箱 搜索 短信 聊天 天气 答疑 导航


新浪首页 > 新浪教育 > 美国高质量的中小学校并不在城里

美国高等中小学在城外
http://www.sina.com.cn 2004/01/19 10:36  北京青年报

  In China there is a huge difference in the average academic achievement of students from country schools versus city schools. A similar gap exists in America except that the high-achieving schools are not in the city but the countryside, or the suburbs. Cities generally have low-achieving schools with many of the same problems that afflict rural schools in China: less well-trained staff and fewer resources. Test scores are high in suburban schools and low in city schools.

  In November 2002, the UN Children's Fund published a report on the performance of rich industrialized nations in meeting the educational needs of their children. The data came from 24 countries of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The goal of the UN report was to compare educational underachievement across the industrialized countries. It measured the proportion of students falling below certain standards of achievement. The report also looked at how far beneath the national average the lowest-achieving students were allowed to fall. A table called the 'Educational Disadvantage League' ranked the 24 nations in the study. If a nation was at the top, there was relatively little difference between high-scoring students and low-scoring students, or between the best and the worst schools. If a country appeared at the bottom of the list, that country had a comparatively large achievement gap.

  The results for the US were shocking: of 24 nations, America ranked 18th. A journalist decried the data in the report as shameful for the nation. Only 6 nations ranked below the US: Germany, Denmark, Spain, Italy, Greece, and lastly Portugal. The top seven nations, those in which there was little difference between the achievement of top students and those at the bottom, were Korea, Japan, Finland, Canada, Australia, Austria and the UK.

  In the US, schooling is free from grade 1 to grade 12, and school costs are paid by the cities and towns. Americans pay taxes to a state as well as to the federal government; the state government and local school boards provide money for public education. Towns with a large tax base, i.e. with wealthier citizens, can afford to put more money /into/ their local schools. As their incomes grow, Americans tend to move from the cities to the suburbs.

  There are several other factors which contribute to better schools in the suburbs. Better-off parents can be more involved in their children's lives. Parents vote for the boards that oversee the school system, and more educated parents also make their voice heard inside their child's school. In addition, these middle- and upper-class families have greater resources to devote to their children: cash not only for books, magazines, trips to museums, concerts and travel, but also for extra classes in music, sports and academic subjects.

  City centers are /where/ one finds a greater concentration of low-income housing, as well as housing for welfare recipients and shelters for the homeless. Apartments are smaller and more run down. New immigrants congregate in the cities, taking such service sector jobs as washing dishes and cleaning residences or offices. Consequently city schools lack a wealthy tax base and are short of money. A cycle begins. There is less money for school buildings, books and supplies. These schools are often staffed with less experienced teachers or older burnt-out teachers just waiting to retire. Ever fewer①parents want to send their children to schools in such manifest decline.

  What can be done about the achievement gap? First, we need to educate the public. Most people have never read the UN report. As in China, Americans who send children to better schools seldom live next door to the poor. They do not see the effects of poverty and educational discrimination. We need to realize that what is good for our child is good for everyone's child. We need to stop blaming poverty, parents or the home environment for the difficulty a child has in learning. Some children are scared; some have been convinced they cannot learn, but in thirty years of teaching I never met a child who did not want to succeed. It is our job as teachers to help every child move ahead triumphantly. We can do it! We the teachers are the diagnosticians who can look at a child and discover his or her strengths. We need to break tasks /into/ small stages to assure success at each level. A child may start with very small steps but as confidence and ability grow, the child will leap ahead, faster and further each day. Academic success is our goal and academic achievement must become every child's birthright.

美国高质量的中小学校并不在城里

  在中国,城里学校与农村学校的学生质量通常有着很大的差别。在美国,类似的差别也存在,只不过高质量的学校不是在城里,而是在农村,或者是在郊区。城里的学校一般说来质量较差,那些困扰中国农村学校的很多问题在这些学校中同样存在:缺少训练有素的师资和相对少的财力;郊区学校学生的考试成绩高,城里的则低。

  在2002年11月,联合国儿童基金会发布了一份报告,内容是富裕的工业化国家在满足儿童受教育的需求方面履行得怎么样。统计资料来自经济合作与发展组织(OECD)的24个国家。这份报告的目的是对这些工业化国家在教育质量不达标的方面进行比较。该报告统计了在某一质量标准之下的学生所占的比例,并且关注学习最差的学生与全国平均水平相比所被允许的最大差距是多少。一项被称之为“教育缺陷等级”的表格列出了研究中的24个国家,如果哪个国家位于表格的最上端,就说明该国学习成绩最好与最差的学生之间的差别或者说好校与差校之间的差别比较小;如果哪个国家的名字出现在表格的最底端,那就表明,这个国家在这方面存在着相当大的差异。

  统计结果令美国震惊:在24个国家中,美国名列18。一位记者将报告中的这一数据称之为是“令美国感到羞耻的”。只有6个国家排在美国后面:德国、丹麦、西班牙、意大利、希腊,最后是葡萄牙。前7位国家也就是那些尖子生与撮底生之间差距很小的国家是韩国、日本、芬兰、加拿大、澳大利亚、奥地利和英国。

  在美国,从小学一年级到12年级(高三)是免费的,学校的费用由所在的城市、城镇支付。美国人要向州政府和联邦政府交税,州政府和当地的学校董事会则为公立学校出费用。那些有着比较大的税收基础的城镇,也就是说,居民比较富裕的城镇,就能把比较多的钱投入到学校中去。而美国人在收入增加以后,往往会从城市搬到郊区去住。

  还有几项因素造成了郊区学校的教学质量比较高。富裕起来的父母能够更多地参与孩子的生活;父母会参与投票,选举对学校体制进行监督的校董会;文化程度较高的父母还会让孩子所在的学校听到自己的声音。此外,这些中产阶级和上层阶级的家庭拥有更大的财力用于孩子:不仅能给孩子买书报杂志,参观博物馆,听音乐会,外出旅行,还能让孩子上音乐、体育和文化方面的课外班。

  而在城市中心地带,你会看到那里是集中了低收入家庭住所的地方,还有领取社会救济的人的住所和为无家可归的人准备的避难所。居民楼里的单元比较小,也更破旧。新移民都聚集在城市,寻找服务性工作,诸如刷盘子,为家庭或办公室打扫房间等。由此而来的是城里学校缺少富裕的税收基础而经费不足,恶性循环开始了。学校的教学楼、书籍和一切设施都缺钱,学校的师资往往是缺少经验的老师或是上了年纪体力不支只等着退休的老师。越来越少的家长愿意把孩子送到这种显然是每况愈下的学校。

  对于教育质量间的“沟壑”应该采取些什么行动呢?首先,我们需要教育公众。大多数人从没有读过联合国的这份报告。就像在中国一样,那些把孩子送到好学校的美国人很少与穷人家为邻,他们看不到贫穷以及教育上的不平等造成的影响。我们应该意识到凡是对我们自己孩子有益的,对每个人的孩子都是有益的。我们不应因孩子在学习上有困难而去谴责贫穷、父母和家庭环境。有的孩子很害怕,有的孩子总认为自己学不好,但是在我30年的教育生涯中,我从未遇到一个不想成功的孩子。帮助每一个孩子成功地向前迈进是我们当教师的职责,我们能够做到这一点!我们———教师,是诊断专家,能够关注孩子并发现他身上的力量。我们需要把任务分解细化,以确保在每一个层次上成功。一个孩子在开始学习时可能步子很小,但随着信心与能力的增长,他就能跳跃了,每天都会跳得更快,更远。孩子们在学习上的成功是我们的目标,取得好的成绩应该成为每个孩子与生俱来的权利。




英语学习论坛】【评论】【 】【打印】【关闭
Annotation

新闻查询帮助



文化教育意见反馈留言板电话:010-62630930-5178 欢迎批评指正

新浪简介 | About Sina | 广告服务 | 招聘信息 | 网站律师 | SINA English | 会员注册 | 产品答疑

Copyright © 1996 - 2004 SINA Inc. All Rights Reserved

版权所有 新浪网
北京市通信公司提供网络带宽