美国总统大选我会选谁 |
http://www.sina.com.cn 2004/11/03 10:33 北京青年报 |
Ryan Armitage for the DemocratsChoosing a president is no easy matter. American presidents are not figureheads; their personal priorities can lead to initiatives that have a tremendous impact on the nation and the world. After careful consideration, I have chosen to give my support to John Kerry. Behind this decision are Kerry's views on three broad issues of overriding importance to me. Theenvironment. The 1972 UN Conference on the Human Environment declared that "man's environment, the natural and the man-made, is essential to his well-being and to the enjoyment of basic human rights -- even the right to life itself." As a senator, Mr. Kerry has established a solid record of support for environmental protection. In fact, he has been called one of the most pro-environment people in Congress. He has voted repeatedly for measures that would enforce strict observance of the Clean Air and Clean Water acts as well as promote wilderness protection. John Kerry has promised, if elected, to promote cleaner and greener communities by setting new standards of environmental excellence for America. They will focus on clean air, clean water and a green landscape for all. Healthinsurance. Year after year healthcare costs in America continue to rise. Family USA, a family advocacy group, has reported that "workers' costs for health insurance have risen by 36 percent since 2000, dwarfing the average 12.4 percent increase in earnings since President Bush took office." Furthermore, companies are being forced to cut retirees' benefits. There are also 45 million uninsured Americans who simply cannot afford to pay for insurance. John Kerry and John Edwards have a plan to give low-cost high-quality coverage to 95 percent of Americans. Their goal is to provide all Americans with access to the same coverage that members of Congress give themselves. Foreignpolicy. The world faces a real threat of continuing terrorism. America has a great tradition of working with the wider world①on shared problems. Unfortunately, the nation has recently turned away from its allies; its international reputation has suffered as a result. From his grade school education in Europe to his time on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, John Kerry has acquired the international experience needed to restore America's credibility. He has called for a collective foreign policy that respects the role of the United Nations. At the same time, Kerry has stated that America should secure its freedom of action by lessening its dangerous dependence on Middle Eastern oil.(Ryan Armitage) Dan Westerbrook for the GOPThe main reason I'm voting for Bush for president is leadership. George W. Bush has demonstrated leadership not only as president, but also previously as governor of Texas, and prior to that in business. This doesn't mean I agree with all the decisions he has made: I don't. For instance, I was not in favor of the attack on Iraq. I disapproved not because I believed Saddam Hussein was such a nice guy but rather because my experience in living in other cultures has taught me that it is very difficult, if not impossible, for foreigners to understand and change another country's culture. Mind you, at the time the decision was made to attack Iraq both President Bush and Senator Kerry supported the policy. Thus I don't find much difference between the two candidates on this issue, even if Kerry now says he would have done it differently. Isn't hindsight a wonderful thing! But leadership, you know, isn't about taking the easy route; it is about making the tough, sometimes unpopular decisions. President Bush has demonstrated that he can make tough decisions, and I personally like the fact that his faith, his values, are the foundation of his decisions. On the other side, I am concerned that Senator Kerry has never been the person in charge, the responsible leader. "Recommending" and making comments about "what I would do" are very different from deciding on a real course of action, while trying to cope with too much information or too little information or incorrect information -- and uncertainty as to which it is! Kerry's Senate voting record over the last 20 years demonstrates a certain tendency to flip-flop on major issues, and this I find troubling. Last weekend TheInternationalHeraldTribune ran an article about Kerry going duck hunting. He is obviously trying to gain the support of the gun lobby, but he doesn't want to offend the gun control groups. So he goes hunting, apparently kills some ducks, but never appears before cameras while carrying any of the birds he shot. When asked about the hunt, he changes the subject to baseball. I don't care whether he is for or against hunting; my point is that he should stand up for what he believes, no matter who agrees or disagrees. He should be a leader, not a chameleon.(Dan Westerbrook) |
老外直言:今年美国总统大选我选谁 |
我选克里 [本文作者来恩-尔米特吉(Ryan Armitage)是一名20多岁的美国青年,现在北京一所高校任教。] 选择总统可不是件容易的事儿。美国的总统并非有名无实的领袖,他们的个人倾向可导致对美国乃至世界都产生巨大影响的决策。在经过慎重考虑后,我决定把我的一票投给克里。我做出这一决定是基于克里在三大问题上的观点,而这三大问题在我看来极为重要。 环境保护:1972年召开的“联合国人类环境会议”宣布:“人类的环境(包括自然环境和人为环境),对于人类的福祉,对于享有基本人权,乃至活着的权利,都是最基本的。”克里先生在担任参议员期间,具有公认的支持环保的良好记录。事实上,他被称为国会里最支持环保的议员。他多次投票支持严格执行《清洁空气法》和《清洁水法》以及加强荒野地带保护的法案。克里承诺,若能当选总统,他将通过设定新的环保标准来推进更清洁、更环保的社区。他们将把精力集中在为所有人提供洁净的空气、清洁的水和绿色的环境上。 医疗保险:美国的医疗费用正年复一年地持续增长。一个名为“美国家庭”的主张家庭利益的团体报道说,“自2000年以来,美国工人的医疗保险支出上升了36%,相比之下,布什总统就任以来平均收入增长率为12.4%就显得很小了。”而且,许多公司正被迫削减退休人员的福利。另外还有4500万没有医疗保险的美国人,他们根本买不起保险。克里和爱德华兹有一项计划,该计划将让95%的美国人享有低收费、高质量的医疗保险,他们的目标是让所有的美国人都能获得与国会议员们为自己提供的医保范围相同的保险。 对外政策:全世界正面临着持续不断的恐怖主义的切实威胁。美国有着与其他国家就共同问题进行合作的优良传统。令人遗憾的是,最近我们这个国家与自己的盟友分道扬镳了,结果是美国的国际声誉受到了损害。而就克里来说,从他在欧洲受的小学教育,到在参议院对外关系委员会的任职经历,都使他具备了恢复美国信誉所需要的国际经验。他提倡与盟国磋商、尊重联合国作用的对外政策。与此同时,克里还申明美国应减少对中东石油的依赖——这是一种危险的依赖——来保障美国的行动自由。 我选布什 [本文作者丹-维斯特布鲁克(Dan Westerbrook)是美国一跨国公司负责人,在北京已工作3年。] 我选布什当总统的主要原因是他的领导能力。布什不仅在担任总统期间证实了这一能力,以前作为得克萨斯州州长以及更早的从商经历,都证明了其领导能力。但这并不意味着我赞同他做出的所有决定:我不赞成。 比如说,我不赞成出兵伊拉克。我不赞成并非因为我相信萨达姆·侯赛因是个好人,而是因为在与美国不同的文化中生活过的经历使我懂得,外国人很难——恐怕也不可能——理解并改变另一个国家的文化。有一点提醒您注意,当决定出击伊拉克时,布什总统和克里参议员都是支持这项决策的。因此,在这个问题上我没觉得两位候选人有多大不同,尽管现在克里说,如果是他就会以不同的方式来做,事后诸葛亮真了不起啊! 可是当领导,要知道,那并不是走一条好走的路的问题,而是要作出艰难的、有时甚至是不受欢迎的决定。布什总统已经证明他能作出艰难的决定,而我个人喜欢的一点是,他的信念和他的价值观念是他决策的基础。 另一方面,我担心的是克里参议员从未做过主管领导——负有责任的领导。“建议”和发表评论说“如果是我会怎么做”与就一项现实行动做出决定是很不一样的,而要做这种决定,得努力处理或是极多的信息、或是极少的信息,抑或是不正确的信息——而这一切都是不确定的!在过去的20年里,克里参议员的投票记录显示,他在重大问题上有一种摇摆不定的趋势,这让我感到不安。 上周末,《国际先驱论坛报》发表了一篇有关克里去打野鸭的文章,显然,他正力图获得那些游说允许持枪的说客们的支持,但他又不想得罪主张控制枪支的团体。于是他去打猎了,像是打到了些野鸭,但他在摄像机前决没有提着任何一只野鸭出现。当被问及此次打猎的情况时,他将话题转到了棒球上。我不在乎他是赞成还是反对打猎,我的看法是,他应该坚持自己所信奉的观点,不管别人同意还是不同意。他应当是一位领导,而不是一条变色龙。 |