司法考试If a girl cherishes her long hair as an essential element in her life, and her rival in love cuts it off, can the rival’s behavior be deemed a violation of the right of life?
甲女视其长发如生命，被情敌乙尽数剪去，这种情况是否构成对生命权的侵犯？
China’s National Judicial Exam has made a splash online with several of its tricky questions, such as the one above, were shared publicly. The National Judicial Exam is designed to assess whether an examinee is qualified to practice law in China. A total of 438,000 people took the exam this year.
中国国家司法考试凭借几道微妙的问题在网络上引起了“轩然大波”，例如以上这一道题就成了公众的“噱头”。国家司法考试为评估中国评估考生是否能够从事法律而设立。今年共计43.8万人参加了考试。
Though the official answer to the now infamous question has not been released by the Ministry of Justice, social media users have argued for their own choices.
虽然司法部还未发布这一现在备受争议问题的官方答案，但是社交媒体用户们已经为他们自己的选择做出了辩解。
"Long hair is more important than life for me. [Someone] cutting my hair on purpose would be equal to a murder. There is no reason why such appalling behavior cannot be deemed a severe violation of the right of life,"one netizen reasoned.
“长发对我来说比生命还要重要。（某人）蓄意减掉我的头发无异于谋杀。没有理由这一可怕的行为不被视为对生命权的一种严重侵犯。”一位网友推断说。
Others held a different opinion, arguing that the behavior does not constitute a crime.
而其他人却持有一种不同的观点，他们争论说这种行为并不构成犯罪。
"Hair cannot fall under the category of the right of life. Snipping off someone's hair is different from cutting off someone's head; you can still be alive with a bald head," another netizen wrote.
“头发不应归结到生命权这一类。减掉某人的头发与砍去某人的头不同；秃顶仍然可以活下来。”
This yea's judicial exam requires test-takers to weigh in on several hot social issues. It also covers many crucial legal problems, which represent the law we encounter in our daily lives, a law expert told Guangzhou Daily in an interview.
今年的司法考试要求考生权衡几个热点社会问题。它还囊括了很多关键的法律问题，代表我们在日常生活中遇到的法律，一位法律专家在采访时向《广州日报》表示。
实习编辑：李孟洁
