试题库:

新航道考研倒数第6天:英语阅读模拟练习之二

http://www.sina.com.cn 2007/01/12 19:02  北京新航道学校

  新航道李传伟:考研倒数第六天

  北京新航道学校 李传伟

  阅读模拟练习之二

  Text 3

  Being the founder of the Internet’s largest encyclopedia means Jimmy Wales gets a lot of bizarre e-mail. There are the correspondents who assume he wrote Wikipedia himself and is therefore an expert on everything—like the guy who found vials of mercury in his late grandfather’s attic and wanted Wales, a former options trader, to tell him what to do with them. But the e-mails that make him laugh out loud come from concerned newcomers who have just discovered they have total freedom to edit just about any Wikipedia entry at the click of a button. Oh my God, they write, you’ve got a major security flaw!

  As the old techie saying goes, it’s not a bug, it’s a feature. Wikipedia is a free open-source encyclopedia, which basically means that anyone can log on and add to or edit it. And they do. It has a stunning 1.5 million entries in 76 languages-and counting. Academics are upset by what they see as info anarchy. Loyal Wikipedians argue that collaboration improves articles over time, just as free open-source software like Linux and Firefox is more robust than for-profit competitors because thousands of amateur programmers get to look at the code and suggest changes. It’s the same principle that New Yorker writer James Surowiecki asserted in his best seller The Wisdom of Crowds: large groups of people are inherently smarter than an élite few.

  Wikipedia is in the vanguard of a whole wave of wikis built on that idea. A wiki is a deceptively simple piece of software (little more than five lines of computer code) that you can download for free and use to make a website that can be edited by anyone you like. Need to solve a thorny business problem overnight and all members of your team are in different time zones? Start a wiki. In Silicon Valley, at least, wiki culture has already taken root.

  Inspired by Wikipedia, a Silicon Valley start-up called Socialtext has helped set up wikis at a hundred companies, including Nokia and Kodak. Business wikis are being used for project management, mission statements and cross-company collaborations. Instead of e-mailing a vital Word document to your co-workers—and creating confusion about which version is the most up-to-date—you can now literally all be on the same page: as a wiki Web page, the document automatically reflects all changes by team members. Socialtext CEO Ross Mayfield claims that accelerates project cycles 25%. “A lot of people are afraid because they have to give up control over information,” he says. “But in the end, wikis foster trust.”

  31. Why do many people think that Wikipedia has a “major security flaw”?

  [A] It has lots of bugs.

  [B] Because they don’t understand the concept of a wiki.

  [C] Because Jimmy Wales is not a computer expert.

  [D] Because a wiki is a simple computer code.

  32. Why are many academics unhappy with the idea of a Wikipedia?

  [A] Because they don’t trust online encyclopaedias.

  [B] Because all information in Wikipedia is inherently unreliable.

  [C] Because they believe that certain information should not be available on the internet.

  [D] Because anyone can add or change the information in it.

  33. Which of the following is NOT given as an advantage of a wiki?

  [A] You can choose who edits it.

  [B] Wiki software is free.

  [C] Any bugs in the code can be changed easily.

  [D] It’s easy to use.

  34. Why do “wikis foster trust”?

  [A] Because the people who use it need to trust the information other users post on it.

  [B] Because they are used in business contexts.

  [C] Because they can be used in a wide variety of situations.

  [D] Because only trustworthy people use them.

  35. What kind of reader is the article aimed at?

  [A] Computer specialists.

  [B] Academics who don’t like wikis.

  [C] Computer science students.

  [D] The general reader with an interest in computing.

  Text 4

  “How do I get into journalism?” is a question that almost anyone who works in this trade will have been asked by friends, godchildren, passing students and, in some cases, their parents. The answer, of course, is: “with difficulty”.

  A breezily written new book by the writer, broadcaster and former editor of the Independent on Sunday, Kim Fletcher, recognises this. Its purpose, broadly, is to answer the question posed above, and to offer some tips on how to stay in journalism once you get there. Tenacity matters above all; and there’s a reason to be tenacious. Journalists now are arguably more professional, and certainly more sober, than in the hot metal days of old Fleet Street, but being a hack is still more fun than a barrel of monkeys. You get to have adventures and then write about them. As Fletcher says: “You would do it even if they didn’t pay you.”

  Landing that job is a cat that can be skinned in dozens of ways. In the old days, you’d learn the trade as an indentured apprentice on a regional newspaper—working your way through the newsroom covering jam-making competitions and parish council meetings and, occasionally, bracing yourself for the grim task of the “death-knock”, where you interview the grieving parents of that week’s Tragic Tot, and trouser as many of their family photographs as you can. And thence, in some cases, to Fleet Street—though as Mr. Fletcher points out, nationals are not the be-all and end-all of journalism, and many extremely good hacks prefer to remain on local papers, or ply their trade happily in magazines.

  You can start writing features or reports for some of the many trade and specialist magazines. Or you can sneak straight on to a national as a junior gossip columnist. Others get started by submitting ideas and articles on a freelance basis.

  As Fletcher points out, the editor or section editor to whom you write is—most of the time—itching to throw your letter away; asking you in for an interview, or reading your cuttings, is a time-consuming and probably boring task he would rather avoid. Misspelling his name, or mistaking his job title, is a gift of an excuse to slam-dunk your letter in the cylindrical filing cabinet. Reporters are supposed to be good at finding things out. If you can’t even find out the name of the person you are asking for a job, you aren’t going to be a good reporter.

  36. What is the most important quality a person needs for getting into journalism?

  [A] family connections[B] knowledge

  [C] perseverance[D] professionalism

  37. In the past, what was the usual route to becoming a successful journalist?

  [A] Covering stories that involved the death of children.

  [B] Family connections.

  [C] Working for free.

  [D] Covering (usually) boring events for a local newspaper.

  38. Where do the best journalists work?

  [A] Fleet Street.[B] For the national newspapers.

  [C] Anywhere that accepts features writers.[D] In a variety of places.

  39. Which of the following is NOT given as a common way to start in journalism?

  [A] Having family connections.[B] Writing for trade magazines.

  [C] Writing articles freelance.[D] Writing about celebrities.

  40. What is the “cylindrical filing cabinet” mentioned in the final paragraph?

  [A] A storage place for useless job applications.

  [B] A wastebasket.

  [C] A filing cabinet for personnel files.

  [D] A place for keeping articles that are not immediately needed, but might be needed in the future.

  参考答案:

  31. B 32. D 33. C 34. A 35. D 36. C 37. D 38. D 39. A 40. B

  以上摘自胡敏《考研英语阅读理解精读200篇》

[上一页] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [下一页]

  特别说明:由于各方面情况的不断调整与变化,新浪网所提供的所有考试信息仅供参考,敬请考生以权威部门公布的正式信息为准。

发表评论
爱问(iAsk.com)
相关网页共约6,030,000
不支持Flash